Winds of change let misinformation sweep in
July 19, 2011 at 3:24 pm 8 comments
News of our intention to leave the Winnefox Library System shared catalog has been met with shock and misunderstanding. Coming to quick conclusions can be deceptive. Like buying a new car, you can’t judge by outward appearances. You have to kick the tires and look under the hood to know what you are really getting.
Let me put some rumors to rest. We did not, nor did we ever consider, leaving the shared catalog to pay for the opening of the Express branch near Festival Foods. The branch has been in the works for about three years, with the parked bookmobile our market-tester. The majority of costs to operate the branch will be met by moving the existing Festival staff, materials and communications indoors and by closing the two bookmobiles.
Believe it or not, we’re going to have more material available to Fond du Lac library users as a stand-alone library.
While the methods of getting the material may change, users still will have the Winnefox catalog as well as all the holdings of all the public libraries around the state available to them. Users will have to take a different path to reach their titles, but – eventually – that path will be available online.
So how will leaving Winnefox make more things available? This part gets complicated. Stay with me. Budgets in libraries around the country are falling (ours will be cut some time next year). The trend in U.S. libraries – including those we share with – has been to deal with declining budgets by buying less new material. So sharing makes sense, right? But a growing practice – “XYZ Library hold only” – used to protect materials for home-town customers defeats that purpose of the shared catalog. We’ve been paying Winnefox more than $100,000 a year for the convenience of having all our material mixed together. The $60,000 we’re saving by going standalone will free up more dollars for materials, which will allow us to stay true to our core mission: getting people the materials they want when they want them.
We’ve worked hard over the last 10 years to build a collection that fulfills the “I want it now” needs of our patrons. People want to walk through our doors to pick up the latest James Patterson or an up-to-date Grand Canyon travel guide. They don’t want to be put on reserve lists. So we buy multiple copies of the most-popular items, and we get them on the shelf as quickly as possible. Other libraries don’t buy as many copies, and since all items are shared equally in the Winnefox catalog, this means our customers are waiting longer because our copies are being used to fill holds elsewhere.
Ten percent of our patrons’ holds come from other libraries. We think a good chunk of those holds are of titles we own but came from another location because it was next in line. It’s not at all uncommon for a Fond du Lac customer to receive a Menasha copy of a book today because the Fond du Lac copy went to a Menasha customer yesterday. Shipping books is costly.
We’ll still have the Interlibrary Loan system to get special-purpose material, such as a resource book for home school parents or the sixth edition of King Lear for that term paper.
This is a time when libraries, like all public institutions, are being asked to spend money wisely. As a library director, I have to make service recommendations to the Board of Trustees based not only on what is right for today, but on what will put the library in the best position for the future. I believe that going standalone will give the taxpayers of Fond du Lac the biggest bang for their buck.
That advantage might not be readily available as we enter the transition period – August 1 until we go live in November. It’s going to be clunky and not a little frustrating. But I’m confident the proof will be in the final product.
Kick the tires and look under the hood before judging this car. The new catalog will have more substance, and when you get a chance to see it, perhaps even a little extra glam.
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: .



1.
Diana Skalitzky | July 19, 2011 at 4:58 pm
Ken; At SCLS I have often asked to have this discussion, but many of the members of the LINKcat consortia don’t want to open up “a can of worms”. We lend more than we borrow, and because we are a small library we cannot afford to buy 2 or more copies just to have one stay “at home”. I have always believed we should have a 3 – 6 month moratorium on New materials, just like WISCAT, OCLC and other lending libraries. I don’t mind sharing our great collection. I do mind lending out great new stuff, and then my patrons seeing it only months to years later. The argument that my patrons would then have to also wait is not accurate. I would be buying what they want. And they would get a chance to actually see it. If your shared catalog had such a moratorium on new materials, would you have felt differently?
2.
Ginger | July 19, 2011 at 6:31 pm
I hope that the buying budget is not all spent on ‘many copies of the most popular’ books. These are also readily available at the discount stores. There are also many speciality books that may have only 1 copy in the whole shared system that will be missed and are not available at local retailers. One feature many people would like is to be able to search online for a listing of the lucky day titles available at any location – please consider adding that to the new software.
3.
fdllibrarykenhall | July 19, 2011 at 9:28 pm
Buying individual copies of many specialty books is something we are committed to. That is one of the things libraries are about. Fortunately, you will still be able to obtain individual specialty books from other libraries as well. We are about many copies of “Lucky Day” (most popular) books but don’t want to overlook the specialty items.
4.
Marion Blakely | July 20, 2011 at 3:00 am
I do hope that the new system will let us continue to look up books online (card catalog) and to place holds and renew online, as those are the two features I personally use the most, plus I love the reminders that my books need to be returned. That alone has saved me a lot in fines! It is great that you have the latest best sellers, especially now that the Borders/Walden stores are closing. And, I love the BookCellar!
5.
fdllibrarykenhall | July 20, 2011 at 6:34 pm
Thanks Marion, you most definitely will be able to place holds and renew online. There are a few very nice surprises in store with the new catalog as well. The easier we make it on our customers, the better it is for everyone. And shop the BookCellar often!
6.
Sandy McNicholas | July 21, 2011 at 9:49 am
Ken,
I too love the holds and renews that we currently can do online. I felt unhappy upon hearing about the decision to leave the Winnefox system because it seems we would lose this access. I am going to trust that the new stand-alone Library will be as good as, or better, because I believe you have done an excellent job so far for the Fond du Lac community. Please continue to keep us informed!
7.
Anne | July 27, 2011 at 9:40 pm
If this information had been posted back when the announcement about leaving the Winnefox system was first made, you very likely wouldn’t have received as many angry responses from library users. It was not a matter of people “jumping to conclusions” as you claim. it was a matter of us responding to the information we were originally given. I see facts in this post that were not originally made available on the library website (are they even there by now?) or in the initial newspaper articles that were posted about the topic. Rather than blaming library users for making supposed snap judgements, I think you should acknowledge that not all pertinent information was provided to us at first.
8.
Lisa Reber | July 28, 2011 at 3:48 pm
I commend Mr. Hall and the staff. In this time of higher gas prices, grocery prices, utility prices…….budget cuts need to be made. To realize the discrepancy in the Winnefox system, try to work with them and make the responsible choice is something more of our administrators in public domains should be doing. Thank you Mr. Hall for doing the right thing for Fond du Lac Public Library.